Tourism: The budget’s poor relation

Something rather odd has happened. The 2012 budget for the Balearics, announced by the regional government’s finance minister, Josep Aguiló, is to go up. By 8.6%. It will, in total, be 3,675 million euros.

What is odd about this is that the government has spent the first months since it came to power creating a general sense of alarm and panic. Remarkably, it has now found more than just some loose change down the back of a few sofas.

From the budget, various ministries will get just over 70%. The health service, one should be thankful, isn’t about to collapse under a lack of money; it will receive 3% more. But as you look down the list of which ministry gets what, there, languishing at the bottom, is the ministry for tourism and sport. 63 million in all. Oh well, so much for tourism being the motor for economic recovery.

The amount might seem paltry, less than 2% of the government’s total spend, but it is roughly the same as that for business promotion and employment and not much less than the ministry of the presidency (whatever that actually does). Agriculture and the environment seems to have fared much better, harvesting 231 million.

There does seem to be a bit of an imbalance, as agriculture counts for only around 1.5% of the economy, but it’s hard to tell exactly what goes to agriculture alone as it has been wrapped up into the super-ministry along with the environment, which could probably do with some money to replant all the forest that people have so thoughtfully set fire to this year.

The other way of looking at the tourism ministry’s budget is that it is in fact a reasonable wedge, and I rather fear some people might it look at like this. Come on, Carlos, they’ll be saying, get those ads on prime-time British TV sorted out. Fortunately, Carlos (Delgado of that ilk) is proving to be the Arsène Wenger of the tourism world. He’s not about to blow the lot on some marquee signing of a celeb and have him or her (well, him, as it could only be Nadal) extol the virtues of the Balearics during a “Corrie” ad break.

Something else rather odd has also been happening. And that is that tax receipts have shot up. They have shot up that much that government tax revenue is greater than it was BC (before crisis). Partly this is down to an excellent tourism season and to the increase in IVA.

The socialist opposition, moaning that the budget should have been and could have been announced much earlier and therefore implying that the delay has been manufactured so as to allow Bauzá as much panic-inducing time as possible, reckons that it can take some credit for the tax bonanza. It must have been the previous administration that paved the way for the excellent tourism season. Which is of course a load of rot. Everyone knows why it has been an excellent season, and it had nothing to do with policies of the regional government.

The fact, though, that tax revenues have increased does undermine to an extent Bauzá’s state of alarm. What they also suggest is that the IVA rise has not proven to be detrimental to tourism, so contradicting predictions that preceded the increase and the Partido Popular’s own intentions to create a “super-reduced” rate of IVA for the tourism sector.

What this year has shown is that spending shedloads on tourism promotion is unnecessary when the conditions are right. Sadly, Arab springs don’t come around too often, so it’s not as though Delgado can become too Wenger-like. An IVA reduction for the sector might still be wise, though it is far less important than has been made out, even faced with a revival in tourism-market competition in 2012.

To achieve anything like a repeat of the 2011 tourism season next year does demand that the tourism ministry gets its cheque-book out. But its budget is not so huge that it can afford to fritter away ten or twenty per cent on television advertising campaigns; and please, let’s not forget that there are countries other than the UK which are promoted to.

The effectiveness of spend is what matters. TV campaigns create an impression of something being done when their returns are relatively that much lower than those through other means, such as incentivising tour operators, airlines, hotels and overseas delegations and exploiting the internet and now mobile technology.

Something rather odd has indeed happened. And that’s that there are reasons to be cheerful, and it’s tourism that can be thanked, even if luck can also take a bow.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

Guilty By Associations

How many associations, federations, organisations can one island need? How many such bodies can one industry need? Tourism is hugely important, but the industry is sinking under the sheer weight of its collective organisational body.

Let’s identify, shall we, just some of these organisations. Among those charged with tourism promotion and development are the Balearics Tourism Agency, the Fomento del Turismo (Mallorcan Tourism Board), the Fundación Mallorca Turismo, the Mesa del Turismo and the cluster Balears.t, to which will soon be added “mesas de alcaldes” (literally, mayors’ tables).

The hoteliers, in addition to federations in different towns, have at least two bodies – a federation of hoteliers and an association of hotel chains. Businesses, other than the hotels, are represented by Acotur, Pimeco, the chamber of commerce, and the local confederation of businesses. To all this lot, you can add associations for different niches and whatever the town halls might or might not be up to.

Duplication, triplication, quadruplication are endemic in Mallorca. Why have one organisation when a dozen will do just as well? It all starts at the top of course. At governmental level. President Bauzà is at least trying to address the duplications that exist between regional government, island councils and town halls, but he faces an uphill task in a society which appears to believe in more being better, especially if this means several bodies doing the same as each other.

Is Mallorca’s tourism industry disappearing up its own backside of associations? Or did it disappear there some time ago? What on earth do all these different organisations do? Apart from duplications, the impression is of a multiplicity of talking shops and competing and self-interests.

I’ll give you a test. Tell me this. What is the difference between the Balearics Tourism Agency, the Fomento del Turismo and the Fundación Mallorca Turismo? Give up? The answer is that the first is part of the regional government’s tourism ministry. The second is private with, among others, directors of leading hotel chains on its board. As for the third, this comprises the Council of Mallorca, the Mallorcan hoteliers federation, the chamber of commerce and … and the Fomento del Turismo. And what do they all they do? Pretty much the same things. Twice over in the case of the Fomento, to say nothing of the hoteliers popping up on both the Fomento and separately on the Fundación.

The Mesa del Turismo? Anyone wish to hazard a guess? No? This is the regional government tourism ministry, the local confederation of businesses and the main trades unions. Cluster Balears.t? What in God’s name is this? Hard to say, but it wishes to improve the selling of the Balearics tourism product, which is presumably what all the others want to do as well.

And now we are going to get the mayors’ tables. This is a new nest of tables dreamt up by tourism minister Delgado. The mayors of the Balearics can sit around them and come up with ways to improve the quality of the Balearics brand. To do what!? Yes, to improve the Balearics brand. What’s it got to do with the mayors? And there we were also thinking that Delgado had cottoned onto the idea that you brand what the tourist punter recognises (Mallorca for example) and not the unrecognisable, be it Calvia or the Balearics.

Then you come to the associations for businesses, those for the hotels and those primarily for the complementary offer, i.e. anything to do with tourism which isn’t a hotel.

Acotur, the association of tourist businesses (appropriately enough) has, as an example of its efforts, been talking to Alcúdia’s mayor about pressing concerns in the resort, one of them being the scale of illegal street selling. It has actually (and unsuccessfully) been trying to do something about this for years, producing notices of a “Grange Hill” “just say no” style to ask tourists not to buy from the looky-looky men.

The mayor will probably do nothing, other than say that the police are looking into it and to remind everyone that there is a local by-law that outlaws street selling (and indeed the purchase of illegally traded products), which does raise the question as to why an individual town hall needs to have a separate law or to act unilaterally, a point which Pimeco (small to medium businesses association), and not Acotur, wishes to address by getting all 53 local councils to unify in a grand anti-looky action.

I apologise. I can well imagine that you are totally lost by now. It is small wonder though. So many bodies, so many doing the same things, and so many failing to achieve anything. Mallorca. Guilty by associations.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

Smile, You’re On Camera

Video and the internet have enabled us to become virtual tourists. Though I worry that there are strange people who spend hours staring at a barely changing image of a promenade or sea front in Mallorca through the medium of a shaky webcam, to be able to drop in and take a quick view of what a place is like at any time does have some attraction.

One problem with webcams, other than the fact that the images are often not very good or the camera isn’t working, is that many of them aren’t registered. Mallorca is not a heavily surveillance society. It adheres to Spanish regulations governing data protection and privacy, but it is these regulations that webcams can flout.

Security cameras for property are meant to avoid showing the “public way”. In other words, they have to be trained on entrances, access points and so on and not, potentially, on members of the public who might be passing by. Regardless of whether the public way is being shown or not, the right authorisation and controls are needed, which come from the police and the data protection agency.

There has been an increase in public way surveillance, however, and this is as a result of the police requiring systems to watch for potential delinquency. Though this increase has caused some disquiet, the use of cameras is nevertheless authorised. Webcams often are not.

Webcams have cropped up in an unexpected context. The ongoing court investigations surrounding alleged corruption and other misdemeanours at the tourism ministry have now focussed on webcams that were put up following the ETA bombs in 2009.

It was not unreasonable for the regional government to think that ETA might just place a bomb or two on tourist beaches. The terrorist organisation had done so in the past. It was this concern that was the backdrop to the tourism ministry setting about putting up surveillance webcams on hotel sites that were trained onto the beaches.

On the face of it, this may sound like it was a sensible precaution. Sensible or not, little that was occurring at the tourism ministry or at its strategy institute, Inestur, during Miguel Nadal’s period as minister is escaping the scrutiny of the investigators.

But then, how sensible as a precaution was it? The number of webcams amounted to five in total. One of them was put up at the Nuevas Palmeras hotel, part of the Sunwing Resort, in Alcúdia. Anyone with even a vague idea of the geography of Alcúdia’s coastline will know that the beach stretches for several kilometres. The other four were in four different resorts. As surveillance measures go, they were of limited or even no use.

Apart from the fact that investigators might want to know if there was any government cash going somewhere it shouldn’t have, they also want to know whether permission was actually sought or indeed granted for the cameras to be put up. Furthermore, they want to know whether these cameras are still there, whether they are working, who exactly is looking at or controlling the images captured and whether these images have been or are being stored.

Here’s a question for you. If you are a sunbather on a beach in Mallorca, do you want a camera to be watching you? I suspect you don’t. And this goes to the heart of the privacy laws. The investigators are quite right to be taking a wider interest in the webcam affair than just any possible financial wrongdoing.

A mystery of this case is the line of authorisation. No mention is being made of the security forces. It was Miguel Nadal, the tourism minister remember, who appeared to order the cameras’ installation; for the regional government, either through the tourism ministry or another agency, to undertake the sort of surveillance which appears to have occurred (may still be), it has to refer the matter to the delegation for the Balearics at central government.

It’s all about checks and balances. Privacy and data protection are taken seriously in Spain. The contrast is sometimes made between the liberal application of privacy laws in Britain with the greater rigour in Spain and in Germany. The contrast owes much to contrasting political regimes of the last century.

It may all seem pretty innocent, sticking up a webcam and showing views of a beach or a promenade or whatever. But there are meant to be rules.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

Desperation: Promotion to the British market

The Balearic Government and the Spanish tourism promotion agency, Turespaña, are combining to spend one and a half million euros on a campaign to attract last-minute British tourists. This comes in the context of an 11% decline in British tourism this season. The campaign will be a pure selling one, rather than one with “image” in mind.

The fact that this campaign is being launched now raises questions. Why wasn’t something done earlier when it was clear that the British market was down? Why does it take the admission of poor numbers from the UK to convince the government and others that concentrating on “image” promotion is largely irrelevant? What will these poor numbers mean in more general terms?

The answers to the first two questions can be explained, in part, by the turmoil at the tourism ministry and the lack of cohesion in respect of marketing this year and by an erroneous belief that spending considerable amounts of money on celebrities, i.e. Rafa Nadal, to appear in adverts that get shunted to obscure outer reaches of television will have any impact. The third question is more complex.

There was a decline in British tourism last year as well, and we know why. It may be a short-term decline, but hoteliers and tour operators cannot afford to wait for the short term to end. In other words, they cannot afford for 2011 to be as Brit bad. They cannot afford for occupancy figures to be the same, or worse, than those which have been admitted to in certain instances: occupancy rates as low as 25% or little better than 50% in specific hotels in both Puerto Alcúdia and Puerto Pollensa, hotels with a high reliance on the British market.

What is becoming clear is that some hotels are looking to lessen this reliance or get rid of the British altogether. It isn’t only the stronger of the established markets, German and Scandinavian, to which they are turning; the new markets of eastern Europe are being eyed up with ever-increasing desire. What one may well find is a distinct shift in terms of tourism demographics, both geographically and socially. Take, for example, the experience of Cala San Vicente. It has seen the influx of an economy-class Polish market. If the Don Pedro does finally get knocked down, or even if it doesn’t, there’s plenty of space over in Puerto Pollensa, space that could just as easily be made all-inclusive, as with the relatively small Don Pedro (fewer than 150 rooms), space that could be taken up by non-British markets.

Whether this latest promotional campaign will have any effect, who knows. Whether any of these campaigns have much effect, who knows. This one sounds like a case of desperation promotion.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

Clutching At Straws: Concerts and tourism responsibilities

Straw, clutch. Clutch, straw. Elton, Andrea. Andrea, Elton.

On 4 September, Elton John and Andrea Bocelli will be playing Real Mallorca’s stadium. Not at football, but at their day jobs – in the evening. At the risk of offending fans, excuse me if I stifle an unenthusiastic yawn. I may well be out of tune with my audience, some of whom – you, in other words – may be in the audience. At up to a mere 169 euros a pop. Pop music meets the classics at classic prices – they’ve got to be kidding.

Whenever, which isn’t very often, a major name in the music world – or two, as the case may be – pitches up in Mallorca, excitement goes into overdrive, among some. And where Reg and Bocelli are concerned, the government’s tourism ministry is getting excited. Together with the concert’s promoters, it is eyeing the gig up as a means of attracting tourists. Straw, clutch.

The stadium will be able to hold 34,000 for the concert. Not exactly Wembley, but still a fair number of people, but not so many for an island with an 800,000 or so population plus all the others who are knocking about. Two major artists. The tickets went on sale on 21 June. It is now the end of July. Hmm.

The ministry reckons that tour operators will be able to offer packages to come to Mallorca and take in the event. It will “prove a vital adjunct to the success of marketing the Balearic Islands this season” (quote from “The Bulletin”).

Let’s just consider this. Tour operators may indeed be able to offer packages, but isn’t this all a little late? How many tourists would actually come? However many might will make barely a dent in the overall tourism intake over a whole season. A season that, by implication from that quote, has already been something of a success. Has it really? The belated marketing of Reg sounds less like an enhancement of the tourist season and more one of desperation to sell tickets.

Elsewhere in tourism ministry-land, a previous bonkers suggestion that its responsibilities should be handed to the Council of Mallorca has not been taken up fully, but it has been taken up in part. Some of the ministry’s duties, those related to the regulation and administration of tourism businesses, are to go to the council, which presumably will allow the ministry to concentrate on more glamorous tasks, such as trying like hell to fill Mallorca’s stadium when Elton comes to town. It doesn’t really matter where the responsibilities reside, except for the fact that it will have the effect of beefing up the council when the reverse should be happening. If they want to save money, then they should slim it down not fatten it.

The ministry is also to create yet another damn body, this one a “mesa” (table) around which will sit government institutions and the private sector and have a chinwag about boosting some “alternative” tourism, such as trekking and bird-watching. Fair enough perhaps, but not if it merely creates a further link in the not always joined up chain of tourism promotion and not if, as one fears, this “alternative” tourism is largely illusory. Straw, clutch.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

The Chinese Take-Away

The glory that is corruption in Mallorca. The glory and the sheer stupidity. Gloriously stupid. The “Pasarela” operation into what the hell has been going on at IBATUR, the regional government’s tourism promotion agency, has unearthed one of the more bizarre of all the questionable practices.

If you were to want to have translated the acronym IBATUR into Mandarin Chinese, how much do you reckon it would cost? Six letters, that’s all, but let’s be generous as Chinese “letters” are of course nothing like our own. There is generous, though, and there is generous. Would you say that six thousand euros was a fair payment? No, you probably wouldn’t, and nor would the investigators say it was fair either. Which is why they are rather keen to understand why this amount was trousered by one Felip Ferré who just so happens to be a nephew of … you might have guessed it … disgraced former president, Jaume Matas, and who also happens to be implicated in yet another corruption case. The six grand was paid to him by the tourism ministry.

There are other strange questions arising from this investigation, such as one related to ten thousand euros paid to someone to come up with a study into the benefits of golf on the islands, a study that was compiled with information lifted straight from the internet. This may not be in the class of a dodgy dossier based on a PhD thesis, but it is equally stupid, as in did someone really believe that it might not be found out, like six grand for translating six letters might not be found out.

Then you have what was going on at the Fundación Balears Sostenible with its stupid green card, the “tarjeta verde”. Let’s be generous where this is concerned as well, and say that it was a highly altruistic means of providing discounts while at the same time promoting the natural glories of the islands. It was, however, really intended as a way of raising dosh, once the old eco-tax was kicked into the Mediterranean and drowned with the outcry that the tax had caused. How much do you reckon it raised? According to the audit for 2008, it brought in – to the Fundación, charged with its administration – the massive amount of 13,524 euros. It is believed that there has been a shortfall of some 400,000 euros, some of which can be explained, it is alleged, by the fact that hotels selling it have simply not handed over the money (and of course the hotels have been hounded for back-payment of the eco-tax during its shortlived and crazy existence). Set against the lack of revenue are the costs which have given rise to losses on the venture of over a million euros a year. In the hotels’ defence, it is being said that the card had little success with tourists, which is probably true. At ten euros a pop, it may have seemed to offer benefits, but was just another example of how such a discounting approach doesn’t work.

This may not necessarily indicate anything fraudulent – at the Fundación – but it smacks of inefficiency, to say the least. Which brings us to another question – that of pallets and pallets of publicity material on behalf of the Fundación which were stashed away in store and never used.

Corruption and inefficiency. Fraud and waste. Different they may be, but they are two sides of the same coin – the one that was spent and spent by an extravagant and uncontrolled public sector, especially the tourism ministry. One says “was”, as one can but hope that this is no longer the case.

* Acknowledgement to “The Diario” for different reports that informed the above.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

The Corruption Fiesta Season: Operación Pasarela

The fiesta season is in full swing. It is reassuring that elements of Mallorca’s traditions, like the fiestas, are in such rude health, despite everything. There is another tradition that is doing well and which has not succumbed to the slumber of the summer. Political corruption. Like fiesta merry-go-rounds or carousels, the investigations are jolly rides with a certain mystery – the murky world of political life, Mallorcan style.

A new tradition that we can now appreciate is that the corruption investigations centre on the Balearics’ tourism ministry. The latest ones in this tradition are monikered “Operación Pasarela”, the gangway operation. The pirates of Puerto Alcúdia’s Sant Pere fiesta night party are being turned into the Pirates of “Pena”zance and being made to walk the gangway plank of the anti-corruption navy. (Pena refers to a judicial sentence, by the way.)

Whereas the previous – and ongoing – investigation involving the tourism ministry (the vulture case) has to do with goings-on at the old Inestur, the latest is looking at IBATUR, the tourism promotional agency, and at something known as the Fundación Balears Sostenible. All three of these organisations have now been wrapped up into an overarching tourism agency: not before time, and a re-organisation driven by cost-cutting and not by corruption – or maybe someone knew something. Of the three, Inestur and the Fundación were both created during the administration of Jaume Matas, under investigation – as I’m sure you remember – for all manner of carry-on.

The Fundación was established in 2004, primarily to help promote the “tarjeta verde”, the green card of discounts with an environmental angle, and a glorious flop. Why the Fundación, like Inestur, was ever created or was necessary, one has to ask. Both are and were pointless, given IBATUR’s existence and that of various other organisations. The awful conclusion that might be derived from the investigations is that there was another purpose to their creation – allegedly.

While the Unió Mallorquina party has been heavily implicated in the vulture investigation of Inestur, this latest one looks straight at the Partido Popular, Matas’s party. The two parties do occupy similar political ground and are not unknown to partner up. Like other corruption investigations, this one also implicates marketing companies. There is a common theme to these investigations – these media or marketing outfits – along with accusations of false accounting and lining political parties’ pockets: the corruption plod are wondering if money was diverted to political campaigning by Matas, a similar line of enquiry to the vulture case where the UM are concerned.

The currently implicated marketing companies also had much to do with the Mallorca Classic golf tournament, one that was buried into a bunker a couple of years ago, thanks to a withdrawal of government financing, by a government that post-dated the Matas administration. At the time, the government’s pull-out attracted criticism and queries. In light of the Pasarela investigation, rather like the highly questionable institute (Inestur) and Fundación, what now does one make of this withdrawal of financing? The impression given, by all this, is that, just perhaps, someone in the political class knew something. Maybe and, as always, allegedly.

We might have thought that the fiesta season and the arrival of real, hot summer would herald the silly season of little happening. We would have been wrong. The less than silly season of corruption is still with us.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

Billboard Buggins: Tourism minister interviewed

There was an interview with the Balearic Government’s tourism minister in “The Bulletin” yesterday. Had you trawled through a few articles on the state of the islands’ tourism over the past few months (years even), you could have supplied the answers. It’s a miracle of space-filling that two whole pages can say precisely nothing that hasn’t been said before, many times over in certain cases. The last person you probably want to be talking to about local tourism is the tourism minister, unless, that is, you want to hear the same old platitudes, side-stepping and pie-in-the-sky that form the ministerial guide to Mallorcan tourism. It’s not really her fault. Joana Barceló got the gig under the principle of Buggins’s turn and thanks to the permanently revolving door at the tourism ministry. All she has to go by is the manual. An opening question might have been – what qualifies her to be minister?

I’m not going to outline what she said, for the simple reason that you have heard it all before. Politicians are interesting only if you look to interview them into a corner, not to let them merely engage in repetition: tourism ministers would never survive a round on “Just A Minute”. As such, therefore, the interview was revealing for what was not asked and answered. One question that seemed to have been missed was a direct one about what she was going to do about prices. It had after all been previously flagged up (2 April: The Last Supper). Maybe it was left out as we already knew the answer. Nothing. Because there is nothing she can do.

There were other questions that were missed. What incentives, or additional incentives, are to be offered to hotels to stay open in the off-season? Why would tour operators or airlines want to offer holidays or flights in the off-season? What evidence is there that cultural, historical etc. etc. tourism is anything other than a small holiday niche? Is it not all a bit of a myth? Why are there not major tourism attractions all year round? What will be the impact of Gran Scala near Zaragoza (the first phase of which will open on 23 April)?

She was asked about all-inclusives, but she was let off the hook. Minimum standards will be adhered to, she said, and then wandered off into gastronomy in the heartlands of the islands for some unknown reason. Where was the question about the impact of all-inclusives?

Where was the question about the constant attack on the holiday-let sector? Where was the question about the fact that the government, along with the unions and the hoteliers, had decided that the principal problems facing tourism were the lack of winter tourism and that holiday-let sector, when the principal problem is clearly the bread and butter of summer? Where was the question about spending money on a dubious celebrity campaign (Nadal) and for adverts to appear on obscure television channels at strange times? Where was the question about regulations facing bars and restaurants – terrace times, keeping doors closed, smoking? Where was the question about the impact of the IVA rise? Where was the question as to whether she has a clue what goes on at the tourism coalface?

Where, oh where? The problem is that a nice little chat ends up with nice little answers about not a lot and with what is a mix of vague statements about “re-thinking” tourism (as if this hasn’t been spoken about previously) and sounding like a promotional brochure. The interview as billboard.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

We Got Nothing To Be Guilty Of – Mallorca’s tourism corruption

Events surrounding Operación Voltor (Operation Vulture) and the corruption allegations related to Inestur and the tourism ministry have moved on apace. The prosecutors are talking in terms of six years imprisonment for Miquel Nadal, ex-tourism minister, and eleven for the Miquel Flaquer, recent leader of the Unió Mallorquina. One needs to be careful. Though charged, along with others, there have been no trials as such. These announcements are often made as to prison terms, but they are rather unseemly. Guilt does tend to be presumed, perhaps with very good reason, but the pre-match (so to speak) publicity given to stints inside does rather stick in the throat.

Nevertheless, what is emerging is evidence of what the prosecution alleges was a “network of assistance to businesspeople close to the UM” that operated via the tourism ministry with the additional aid of the former leader Flaquer. A key example concerns the awarding of a contract for a voice recognition system worth over a million euros to a technology firm. The police argue that the value was way above what was required, the suspicion being that the money trail ended up in the coffers of the party itself. What all this implies is that the ministry, and therefore also Inestur, were being exploited for gain and being run as some private fiefdom to finance, if not necessarily individuals, but then the UM party – a line of argument denied, as you might expect. Individuals or party, it doesn’t really matter, as it all involves the diversion of public money. It seems extraordinary, assuming one accepts the police’s version, that a ministry can be so run without apparently any checks, until the belated ones of the prosecutors. Moreover, it suggests a vein of collusion coursing through the ministry with drips attached to various individuals all tagged with the name UM.

At present, the investigation seems to centre on the period when Miquel Nadal was minister. His predecessor, Francesc Buils, has not been detained but he is expected to be called to answer questions. No charges have been made against him, but a question which arises is whether the UM, in return for its coalition place, was granted the tourism ministry and then targeted it as a means to a rather different end than that of merely promoting and managing the islands’ tourism industry. Inevitably, the scandal has been used to question the viability of coalition governments in the Balearics (well, by “The Bulletin” anyway). This is plainly not the issue. Coalitions do not beget corruption. The logic of the “viability” argument is that they do, and it is wrong-headed. The issue is corruption – period – and the wider societal malaise that cultivates it. This, and the sheer inadequacy of control mechanisms. I would reiterate a point made more than once on this blog, that to reassure a rightly alarmed electorate, a system of pre-emptive vetting of contract awards is needed, rather than the retrospective actions of the police and prosecutors.

Anyway, back to day-to-day running of government, and there is now a new tourism minister. President Antich has chosen not to assume command, though he has put sport under his direct control, and has moved to tourism the employment minister Joana Barceló, president of the Council of Menorca from 1999 to 2008 and a member of the PSIB-PSOE, i.e. the Balearics wing of the socialist party. Antich is also rebuffing attempts by the Partido Popular to bring a vote of no confidence.

Nothing Has Been Proved – Unió Mallorquina’s disgrace

“Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realise that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.” – Ronald Reagan.

The police have arrested another member of the Unió Mallorquina, the former leader Miquel Flaquer. There are that many former leaders of recent vintage that is hard to keep track. Two of them are now detained, one other makes appearances before courts and keeps her counsel, as befits the former leader of the Council of Mallorca.

Perhaps we should remind ourselves as to the roll-call that is the rogues’ gallery of the UM, lining up for a police mug-shot either now or possibly in the future: Maria Antonia Munar, speaker of parliament and ex-leader of the party; Miquel Nadal, former tourism minister and ex-leader of the party; Miquel Flaquer, ex-leader of the party; Miquel Grimalt, now ex-environment minister; Antoni Oliver, ex-director general of the Inestur tourism institute and now also an ex-director general of environmental quality; Joan Sastre, relieved of his position as head of tourism promotion. To this little lot can be added those now without a job as a consequence of the dismissal of the UM from the coalition – the minister for sport, the minister for tourism, other leading figures at Inestur and at Ibatur, the tourism promotion wing of government. And there are quite a few more.

Look at those above and a pattern emerges; well more than one. A number of Micks who’ve been nicked or who may be, and a number of politicians centred on one ministry – tourism. The easy assumption, and one that the police and prosecutors are making or for which they have hard evidence, is that there was something distinctly rotten in the state of the tourism ministry of the sub-state that is the Balearics. The tourism ministry, the domain, the bailiwick of the UM. The conspiracy theorists are now hard at work. Tourism equals UM equals irritant party equals something that needs obliterating. It may make sense to those of a conspiratorial inclination, but it doesn’t make sense. You wouldn’t conspire against a ministry that happens to oversee the most important industry on the islands, just because it’s under the control of an annoying, third-force party, would you? No. It makes no sense. Forget it.

I say forget it, but then … . It is true that a party like the UM does rather muddy the waters where the major parties are concerned. It may not itself be a major party but it is not insignificant. Clearly not, given the current furore. Moreover, it is a party that is well-represented at mayoral level across the island. It is also a party that represents nationalist interests. Nationalist versus national. UM versus the PSOE and the PP. This is how some are depicting this latest scandal. The wilder and plain bonkers conspiracy theorists may want to dress this all up as some collusion against the UM, but one can – legitimately I believe – wonder as to the corruption accusations levelled at senior UM members. It’s like match-fixing in football. It can’t really work unless the whole team, or several players, are in agreement. Are we really to believe that so many have been engaged in a collusion of their own? It would seem we have to, because this is what is entailed. If so, then this – the UM – is a party that cannot be trusted and that deserves to be blasted into the far reaches of the political universe. But then, that is what some might want.

Another conclusion is that elements within the party appear to have been acting like some sort of self-interested masonic lodge. Funny handshakes and looking after their own. While politicians of other parties are clearly not immune to the temptations afforded by Mallorcan and Balearic politics, the UM, one could argue, is more tight-knit, more indicative of the ties within the islands’ society, more prone to looking after its own and to touting its services in return for feathering its nest with ill-gotten, misappropriated gains. Reagan may have had a point. There again, nothing has yet been proved. And there is that nagging feeling that … .

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.