Suck It And See: The golf course in Muro

Never think that matters in Mallorca draw to a simple conclusion. If you are inclined to think this, then consider the matter of the Muro golf course. Yes, the arguments are of course still going on. What appeared as though it might have been a conclusion, when a bird protection order was made to cover the site of the course, is nothing of the sort, and now the Balearic parliament, thanks to block voting by the centre-right parties (Partido Popular and Unió Mallorquina), has effectively given the development the green light again, the right arguing that the course is in the interest of the island. The left say it is all about private interests, while the enviro lobby group GOB reckons the decision will bring “shame” to the people of Mallorca. The protection order might still hold sway, but if so it will, in all likelihood, need the matter to be booted upstairs, all the way to Brussels. Some 14 years after the project was first talked about, a definitive agreement and indeed conclusion is still to be made.

Something interesting has been happening with the press coverage of the golf development. There have recently been two interviews with the head of the Grupotel hotel chain, one of the main shareholders in the golf course, as well as one with the director of the development company. This has been interesting as the coverage suggests a shift away from what has seemed like press favouritism towards the environmental case. Or perhaps it is just a case of greater balance being applied. The arguments set out by Grupotel and its fellow hotel groups are well known: the course will help to reduce tourism seasonality and to add dynamism to tourism in the area; the development has received favourable environmental reports, and potentially harmful environmental issues have been addressed.

Despite the endless environmental points raised by GOB and the left, the environment is not, for many, the most important issue. What is, is whether the damn course is necessary or can be justified in terms of “adding dynamism”. The pronouncements in the interviews have been vague, as has always been the case where the real value of the course is concerned. The PR problem for the developers is two-fold: the environment and a persuasive business argument. They have singularly failed to be persuasive. No assessment is ever made, at least publicly, as to how many additional tourists the course will generate or as to how much value it will bring to the local economy, except in creating a small number of jobs.

There is an inherent lack of logic to the business case. Firstly, the developers cannot count on a return from the sale of real estate, which is often a core feature of golf developments; there will be no residential construction. Secondly, while making his case for the course, the director of the company pointed out that the Muro course will have advantages over other local courses – unlike Pollensa, it will have eighteen holes, and unlike Alcanada, it will not be a luxury course. However, though this hints at a course for everyone, is a “luxury” aspect not part of a course’s attraction, especially to hotel groups with four- and five-star hotels in their portfolio? Moreover, whatever might be designed in Muro can surely not benefit from the landscapes of Pollensa and Alcanada or the demanding links-style nature of the latter course. Thirdly, there are several hotel groups represented in Playa de Muro which are involved in the development. How can they all benefit, especially as there is seemingly an unknown, and a very important one – the number of tourists?

The course would add to the intangibility of the “quality” of Playa de Muro as a resort. This shouldn’t be underestimated, but it is – once again – a somewhat vague concept, just as the real benefits of the course remain vague. Rather like the so-called “active well-being” branding of the area that is now to be initiated seems like an exercise in sucking it and seeing, with no hard numbers being given and any number of hotels which would be most unlikely to gain any benefit, so it is with the golf course. In business terms, the Muro course has all the feel of being product-led. Here’s a course, now here come the tourists. It doesn’t work like that.

As ever though, the business case for the course might still be redundant if GOB and the left were to finally have their way, and given the tortuous nature of the arguments and challenges over the years, one really shouldn’t rule that out.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

Porn-(ge)-ography: Muro’s golf course stopped

Well, what a surprise. The change in regional government that has created the “super” ministry of environment, planning and transport under the control of a single minister, the PSM Mallorcan socialist “Two Jags” Vicens, has indeed had ramifications for the golf course in Muro – as anticipated (20 February: Mallorca’s Two Jags – Muro and the golf course). The ministry, and therefore government, has approved the extension of a planning restriction order involving the Albufera nature park and much of its surroundings, such as the rustic beach of Es Comú in Playa de Muro and the area of Son Bosc, the finca designated for the building of the golf course; an order aimed at stopping changes to the Playa de Muro geography. This order, known as a “Plan de Ordenación de los Recursos Naturales” (PORN), has been welcomed by the enviro pressurists, GOB. They really ought to do something about their acronyms.

The ramifications of this extension are that work on the course has to be suspended, for at least two years, while studies are undertaken into the area’s natural riches and into its preservation. This comes hard on the heels of the publication by GOB of a letter from the leading British botanist, Richard Bateman, which expressed his “incredulity” as to the “destruction” of the finca and which also drew attention to the existence of a fungus that is vital to the maintenance of the rare orchid, which has been the subject of most of the environmental debate related to the golf development.

Incredulity indeed. Incredulity that further studies are needed. It is debatable whether they are needed, other than as a convenience of politics. The PSM, and Two Jags, don’t want the course to go ahead. It’s as simple as that.

Initial clearance work had begun on Son Bosc. The developers (and also the town hall) don’t necessarily see the ministry’s intervention as definitive, and they are probably right. Hanging over this decision is the possibility of an early election for the regional government. It would have to take place next year in any event. Were there to be a change in governmental complexion (with the Partido Popular restored as leaders, which is quite possible), then there is every chance that this latest delay could be reversed. It was the PP which, back in 2003, effectively removed protection for Son Bosc.

So you see, it is all a matter of politics. The new studies are a red herring. The development comes down to the wishes of the PP (and the Unió Mallorquina) against those on the left, the PSM most notably and what has become almost its provisional wing, GOB.

At the same time as the town hall and mayor Fornés were arguing that work on the course should proceed, as reports from the environment ministry had given the development the all-clear, the local authority was also announcing that it has formalised the purchase of the bull-ring in Muro from the entertainment company, Grup Balañà. It will cost 450,000 euros, and the decision to purchase the site has caused consternation among opposition politicians, aghast at such an investment, given the town hall’s supposedly parlous financial situation.

Why is the town hall doing this? There is an argument that the bull-ring is part of the local heritage and so deserves to be preserved. Fair enough, it dates back to 1922. But how often is it used, and for what? There is a bull-fight during the Sant Joan fiesta in June each year, but otherwise the stadium is largely redundant. The town hall insists that there will be more events, such as concerts, but then it would say that. The town hall also believes that it is a tourist attraction and one that would be added to a “tourist route” in Muro. Who are they kidding? Muro does have some attractions, but it barely features on the tourist list of places to visit as those attractions – the church, the museum for example – are poorly promoted. Maybe the town hall reckons that the golfers would make a trip into the town (some ten kilometres from Playa de Muro). That would be wishful thinking. And moreover, no-one has ever actually stated what sort of numbers would be generated by this damn course.

The bull-ring, the golf course, they are both symptomatic of a tendency to conjure up fantasy tourism, maybe-tourism. And in the case of the bull-ring, it is also representative of something – the bull-fight – that is being rejected by increasing numbers of Spaniards and that is abhorrent to many overseas tourists. Heritage, yep, fine, but the ring also occupies some not invaluable real estate near to the centre of Muro. Of course, if the town hall were to acquire it now, then maybe it might become more valuable in the future. Now there’s a thought. Or, if you were a town hall that needs to raise loans, then it is always useful to have some assets on the balance sheet. And which town hall needs to raise loans – allegedly?

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

Chestnuts Roasting – Street cleaning and golf

A couple of old local chestnuts are being given a further roasting: one that has been long on the brazier and remains so, the other we all thought had been thoroughly cooked and eaten. They are – the street cleaning of Pollensa and the golf course in Muro. Yep, one more time for both of them. Here we go …

Pollensa’s street cleaning goes hi-tech
Pollensa town hall is to double its investment on street cleaning, bringing the annual spend up to 800,000 euros. For a cash-strapped and indebted town hall this represents a far from insignificant increase. The latest round of tendering for the cleaning gig is in progress, and so presumably there will be a contractor in place before long that does actually have a contract.

In return for this increased spend, the good people of Pollensa can now expect to be asked their opinions as to the levels of service. Dependent upon satisfaction findings, the new contractor will be subject to variable payments. Low satisfaction and they don’t get so much. Performance payments in other words. How novel. Moreover, the town hall is to introduce a system of real-time monitoring, via satellite positioning technology, of worker activity and frequency of cleaning. And there I was, mentioning the other day the apparently questionable privacy legal issues with webcams. Someone’s going to be watching you, fellas! Now, there’s an idea, add a webcam to the satellite monitoring, and everyone can watch the dog mess being swept up. They could integrate the opinion surveys and make those function in real time as well. Vote now for the chap doing the pinewalk – marks out of ten! One could then also watch the amounts being paid – or not – to the contractor, like a Comic Relief running total, but bearing in mind that investments can go down as well as up.

And finally … finally they’re building the golf course in Muro
Work on the golf course in Muro is due to now start in the next couple of weeks. You might be forgiven for having thought that it had already started and that all the final impediments to the course’s creation had been overcome. Indeed it had been reported, as long ago as 3 September last year, that work was set to begin during September. The delay seems to have had nothing to do with the endless debates about rare orchids and other environmental matters that had so taxed many, mainly the enviro pressure group GOB, but with the payment of a tax, some 170 grand to the town hall. This money, to be coughed up by the developers, was, we were led to believe, meant to have found its way into the emptying coffers of Muro town hall all those months ago, but has only now been handed over. Which does make one ask why there has been such a delay. There again, the debate regarding the building of the course has gone on for that long that a few months more won’t make much of a difference. And no-one will actually be teeing-off in Muro for some time yet. At least two years, possibly longer. Doubtless we can now anticipate beardies prostrating themselves in front of bulldozers in order to protect the orchids. Not that they need to, as the protection of rare flora on the Son Bosc finca is a condition of the development, and the developers have – for the duration of the work – engaged a firm of environmental consultants who will presumably ensure that the environmental conditions are indeed adhered to.

Any comments to andrew@thealcudiaguide.com please.

Grantchester Meadows

In Cambridgeshire there is a golf course which is completely organic. You’ll have to forgive me, I missed the name of the course, but there was a report about it on Five Live the other day. I emailed the station to ask if they could send me the name, but … . Anyway, the point about this is that it demonstrates the extent to which golf developments are being planned in a way that they have strong environmental elements. The course itself has separate meadows for flowers and birds, while a river attracts numerous types of wild fowl. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has been involved in the planning of the course, and the representative from the RSPB said that, though golf courses can be harmful to the environment, managed correctly there is no reason why courses cannot co-exist happily with nature.

Instinctively, I’m inclined to believe this. A development that just ploughs up habitats unthinkingly is no good, and this may well have been the case in the past: one thinks of all the conversion of unproductive agricultural land in Britain that was turned over to golfers. Yet, why shouldn’t the two make for environmental bedfellows? In the Cambridgeshire case, the golfers themselves are said to be all in favour because of the ambience created, while apparently the Royal and Ancient now have firm environmental management policies.

One says all this in connection with courses in Mallorca, especially those in the planning or to be developed, such as the one in Muro about which there has been such a protracted environmental hoo-hah. Things have gone pretty quiet on the Son Bosc development front, but the Gobby lobby have had its latest objection rejected, one that centred on a less-than-favourable report by its own people being ignored by the environment ministry.

I have never understood why there has been such a fuss, other than the fact that the course might turn out to be a white elephant. From an environmental point of view, it surely can be made to work. Perhaps the Muro developers should be talking to those in Cambridgeshire who are making it work.

Continuing Columbus

And ever more on the Columbus story, and once again thanks to Dom for his feedback on this. There is a blog site – http://www.medievalnews.blogspot.com – which would be good for any of you who might have a general interest in history, but specifically it ran a thing on 26 October entitled “Scholar casts doubt on claims that Columbus was a Catalan”. This reports views of a Dr. Diana Gilliland Wright who questions the significance of a particular form of punctuation used by Columbus and said to be indicative of Catalan of the time. She says that this was used elsewhere, for instance by the Venetians who were of course Italian, even if Venice is some distance from Genoa. Moreover, she says that spelling at that time was “fluid”, which does to a degree support my own view that Columbus could very easily have acquired a “polyglot tongue” especially if his written works were grafted onto what was effectively a blank canvas as native Genoese did not have a written language as such.

Light Up The Sky

‘Tis that time of the year. There is even a Bonfire Night tomorrow night at the Mallorca Cricket Club (“the island’s premier ex-pat community family event , it says: why do they spell expat with a hyphen; it’s one word). But note that it is Bonfire Night, not Guy Fawkes. We’ve stopped having guys. We don’t burn effigies. Or do we? Somewhere in Surrey, they put Jordan to the flame yesterday. What a splendid idea, all that silicone exploding, while a touch of satire, rather like the giant heads in Mallorca at fiesta time, are often satirical representations of local politicians and others. Makes me think. Who would I burn? A couple of clients I can think of could do with a good dousing. Who would you burn? Step forward – probably – Gordon and any number of MPs, but otherwise … ?

Meet The New Boss

Muro has a new mayor. You’re forgiven if you are underwhelmed by the news. Bear with me. The change follows the retirement of the previous incumbent, Jaume Perelló (Unió Mallorquina – UM). His replacement comes from the Partido Popular and Convergencia Democrática Murera (CDM) which garnered the support of the UM at Muro town hall in order to vote in the new mayor. His name is Martí Fornés. I wouldn’t necessarily normally bring such news to your attention, and wouldn’t have had it not been for the opaqueness of the reporting of his ascendancy to the mayoral office. This opaqueness was summed up by “The Diario” which merely said that Sr. Fornés is (was) an “experienced manager” with an “important hotel chain”. The hotel chain was not named, nor was it in any other report I came across. I did some research. Among other things, I found a forum in Catalan and Castellano in which someone asks “where does he work?”. The question posed was a while ago, but it was in connection with the planned golf course in Muro. After nine or ten pages of googling, there was an entry for the El Mundo Eldia website from 5 March 2007. There was the answer. Sr. Fornés was the finance director of Grupotel, the chain based in Muro and with four hotels in Playa de Muro – Alcúdia Suite, Amapola, Los Principes and the five-star Parc Natural. 

 

Why this reticence to disclose the hotel chain? It is a Muro business, a successful one, an employer of people. Let’s put it down to a media determination to not publicise the company. Perhaps. Or is naming the hotel chain somehow breaking a confidence? Surely not. It’s a matter of record. It’s information in the public domain. The reticence only adds to a certain intrigue. And why? Go back to that forum thread about the golf course. 

 

In “The Diario” Sr. Fornés was open about his views as to the development on the Son Bosc finca. To sum them up, he’s in favour of the golf course and believes that it will create employment and will meet environmental requirements. Fair enough; everyone knows where he stands. But the hotel connection does raise some issues, such as the fact that the largest shareholder (with 43%) in Golf Playa de Muro SA, the company behind the development, is Grupotel. (22 December 2008: That’s Just The Way It Is.) Not really that it is anything unusual to have a mayor from this hotel chain; its president, Miquel Ramis, is a one-time incumbent.

 

It doesn’t bother me in the slightest that one hotel chain or another might stand to benefit from the development. Experienced businesspeople are probably just what a place like Muro needs. Otherwise you might end up with some old farmer whose idea of a tourist attraction is to boil a goat and hand out lumps of bread to scoop up the broth. And if they are experienced businesspeople from within the community who have played a role in generating wealth for the town, then I see no problem, especially those with a tourism background. It may sound inappropriate as one has to assume at least some vested interest, but is it really? 

 

I am not opposed to the golf development, certainly not on environmental grounds. What I have yet to be convinced as to is the business case for the development. Presumably one exists, and Sr. Fornés says that it will create more employment. But it would be nice to have it spelt out. Sr. Fornés was a finance director. Maybe he’s the person who can do just that, always bearing in mind that 43% of any business case is Grupotel’s.

 

 

In case you were wondering … Mayors are actually selected by councillors, which is how Sr. Fornés comes to now be mayor. 

 

 

And still down Muro way, a curious thing in “The Bulletin”. It had its “beach of the day” yesterday. Platja de Muro (platja being the Catalan for playa). One could sense that something was not quite right about this, apart from calling it Platja as opposed to Playa as one might expect or the fact that the beach length was stated as being 430 metres; a zero seemed to have been missed. But it read a little oddly, for instance describing Can Picafort (in the directions to the beach) as a “village”. No native speaker would call it that. It’s not so difficult to find the answer – much of this came from the illesbalears site. 

Wheel’s On Fire

When talking about the train, be it the extension to Alcúdia or its history (as was the case on 14 May), it might also be appropriate to bring into the equation the safety and emergency procedures. Well, it might be – is – appropriate if the train operator and the staff were talking about them. One of the trains that runs between Sa Pobla and Palma caught fire the other day at the Verge de Lluc station coming into Palma. It didn’t seem like much of an incident, so I didn’t bother mentioning it, until a report appeared in “The Diario” yesterday which suggested that there are deficiencies in the emergency procedures. It could, say could, have been a more serious incident. As it was, all the 200 or so passengers were evacuated unharmed and without having inhaled anything toxic. But apparently it took ten minutes from the time the fire was detected to the fire service being notified.

“The Diario” has been kind enough to post a short video of the incident to the Daily Motion site. Here is the link – http://www.dailymotion.com/diariodemallorca/video/x9abg2_incendio-en-el-tren-de-inca_news. In the clip, someone shouts out to go, that it could explode; another, on the phone, says that they had intended to put the fire out with extinguishers, but … . Perhaps most troublingly, workers are quoted as saying, since the incident, that “no protocol exists to deal with such situations”.

More on the orchid and the finca
And of course in the aftermath of the environment ministry having made its announcement about the orchid on the Son Bosc finca (yesterday), up pops the oppostion on Muro town hall to say that the finca should be deemed as land covered by the law on the coasts and therefore protected and considered as part of the nature park (of Albufera). The reasoning behind this is that the finca, so the opposition say, forms a second line of dunes and that therefore there should be a reclassification of what constitutes – in this case – public coastal land which cannot be built on.

Oh God, on it goes, and on and on, and for all the environmental discussion and argument, we never seem to be presented with a really good case as to why the wretched course should be built.